I'm Good at Soul Calibur

Before I get to the post, I spent most of this past weekend at the Maryland Film Festival, and am obligated to recommend 'Make-Out with Violence'. It's a terrific movie, and it would be a tragedy if it doesn't get a widespread release. Check out the synopsis, trailer (the trailer is MUCH more reliant on the zombie element than the movie is, it's not really a zombie movie at all) and a couple free tracks from the killer soundtrack at makeoutwithviolence.com.




"I'm Good at Soul Calibur"

a.k.a.

"I'm Good at Smash Bros."

a.k.a.

"I'm Good at Halo"

If you are a casual gamer in your late teens / early 20's, chances are you've said at least one of these phrases at some point in your illustrious gaming career. And chances are, you're wrong.

Hell, I know I was.

Soul Calibur 2 was released in 2002, and it quickly gained massive popularity due to its weapon based combat, its strong visual style, and guest characters, not the least of which was Link from the Zelda series. My circle of gaming friends played the game frequently, and at that point I was arguably the best player in my circle. Obviously, I was 'pretty good' at Soul Calibur 2.

In the early to mid 2000's, I often spent my weekends, especially in the Summer, at my local arcade. (Arcade? What's that?) I'd step into that gaming paradise, chew some gum, smirk, and saunter my 'I'm Good at Soul Calibur' self over to the Calibur 2 machine.



And whenever I dropped my two quarters against the arcade vets like Steve Harrison, I got smashed. Embarrassed, even.



What separates the casual gamer from the hardcore gamer? The bad player from the good? The first two steps a casual must take to walk the path of a champion are those of knowledge and experience.

My knowledge of the game came from playing against people who had no idea what 'frame data' is or was, and neither did I. The piddly combos and setups my Talim could muster paled in comparison to the ones I'd see in the arcade on a Saturday night.

But even then, if I knew all of Talim's frame data and had wild combos and setups, I'd still be in bad shape without matchup experience. My character experience at home was effectively useless against players who were discussing the game in depth on Calibur Forums, or who already had a richer fighting game background. That's only something gained from playing the game against players equal to and better than you.

Suffice it to say, I didn't think I was good at Soul Calibur anymore. In fact, I had a light realization of this blog scrap. There was a time period between my arcade closing in mid 2000 and the first fighting game tournament (No longer Calibur 2, but 3) I attended where I wondered if I actually could compete with the best of Soul Calibur, or any game; if I could actually be - *gasp* - "good". The answer is yes, not just for me, but for anyone. It all starts with gaining the right knowledge and the right experience. At that first tournament, I was greeted by my old arcade terror, Steve Harrison. He was thrilled to see me and gave a big greeting, and once I saw him dispose of the Calibur 3 competition there, there was no leaving this hobby. Steve was, in fact, good at Soul Calibur; it was about time I was, too.

Note: Steve Harrison will be traveling to Japan this year, as he earned a berth in the illustrious Super Battle Opera tournament. Congrats to him.

Steve Harrison after qualifying for Evolution's Guilty Gear 3v3 Team Tournament all by himself

Hilarious example of Steve Harrison playing Soul Calibur

Toasty

I was having a good conversation the other day with my Father on competitive gaming. At age 60, he isn't one to sit down and play a round of Instagib CTF. He enjoyed his foray into less strenuous video games such as Wii Bowling, which he soundly thrashed me at, being an ex-bowler himself. (He made me look terrible.) My Dad is an actuary, spending lots of time with numbers all week long, and is a fan of math / odds based games like Blackjack and (especially) Backgammon.

During our talk, he looks at me and says, "I just don't get it, what's the point of Fighting Games?" It hit me like a sack of bricks. To me, a solid Fighting Game is the blending of chess and action movie. To my Dad watching some guys play a fighter, they mash a bunch of buttons, they beat the shit out of each other on the screen, and someone goes home happy. The whole underlying ruleset is unknown to the outsider - not just my Dad, but to the bulk of fighting game consumers. Spacing, mixups, footsies, oki; an entire language goes unknown to most people that actually buy the fighter. (Except 'wakeup'. Believe me, SF4 XBOX Live Ken knows ALL about wakeups.)

But, is 'Eye Candy Button Masher X' really what sells? It used to. Mortal Kombat II was wildly popular in arcades, and while I have fond memories of the game and it has achieved a cult fanbase, it is by no means a structurally sound game. Mortal Kombat vs. DC is similar; Superman really IS the Superman of that game. His ground pound combos into itself, and if he wins one round, he can bug it so the match doesn't go on to another round; he just wins. MKvDC is sluggish, broken, and created not for a community to delve into, learn, and compete with, but rather made to earn a quick buck off of gamers who want to answer that "timeless" question, who would win between Batman and Sub-Zero? Find out in: Mortal Kombat vs. DC! You know what? Go buy a Wrestling Game, create Batman and Sub-Zero or whoever else you want, and stop funding Midway's awful product. Companies like Midway can get the fuck out of the Fighting Game market. (And they will, too! )

With Street Fighter, Tekken, Guilty Gear, and so on, the designers understand that visuals are important in drawing in the casual fan to the purchase, but they also set out to craft a system that is fun, intriguing, and balanced. These games are sent in early beta phases to arcades for testing amongst the best fighting gamers. You originally had to block C. Viper's Flame Kick while standing; with how good she's proven to be now, imagine how godly Viper would be if that change never happened.

Similarly it's important to note that if you make a game with too many complex inputs, or inaccessible characters / fighting styles, you won't gain the rich fanbase you need to sell copies, much less play your game. But the fact stands; gamers are getting smarter. Competitive games are growing in market and in number. There are game leagues with logos ripped straight from professional sports, prize pools are growing in digits, and there are Starcraft players you might confuse for NASCAR racers with all the logos on their uniforms.



The competitive gaming community is on the rise, and as it spreads, so does its language. While I can't be sure that Fighting Games can ever overcome the burden of the 'Button Masher' branding in the public eye, a man can dream.

Tournament Play

I Got Next is going to be some good.

This past weekend, I was in Ashburn, Virginia for a tournament, C3 Revivial Night. The main event of the day was the Street Fighter 4 3v3 Team Tournament, which had some of the East Coast's top players. Our team finished 7th out of about 28 teams, largely thanks to some crazy good teammates. SF4 3v3 is a very interesting format; each team sends out one of their players to fight (at point), and the winner stays on the machine. The losing player's team gets to choose who to send out next; for instance, if our M. Bison just lost to their Balrog, we send in our Zangief, since Zangief has a favorable matchup against Balrog. Sending in Zangief, however, means that if we win, they're likely to bring in their Sagat, who's a bad match for Gief. Making teams that are able to handle a wide variety of the entire roster and figuring out team order is part of the fun, on top of cheering for your teammates. It's an absolute blast, and goes to show that 1v1 isn't the only way to make a competitive fighting game entertaining.

Games can really shine when the game extends past the ruleset and actually fuels player interaction / emotion; when something happens in the game that lives on far after the game has ended. In Fighting Games, the most infamous moment is likely the Evolution Daigo / Justin Wong Street Fighter 3 video. Street Fighter 4 just got its first. If you haven't seen this video, it's about time you have.

Kensou (C. Viper) vs. Liston (Sagat), Final Round Top 32

Pros and Cons

As I flesh out the meat and bones of this card game, I want to make sure it's a blast to play. What are the pros and cons from a 'fun' gameplay standpoint of a card game and a fighting game relevant to my idea, and what can be taken from them? Long post incoming.

Magic: The Gathering Pros and Cons;

+ Collecting. The cards all have value, different rarities / availability, and some slick artwork. 

+ Deck Variety. Tons of cards, tons of options. There are competitive decks, casual decks, crappy decks and janky decks. The amount of cards also means there's generally some card(s) that counter the "best" deck in the format. 

+ Wide gameplay options. There are generally lots of decisions to be made in the game, especially in draft and Type 2, and it's a far cry from the rudimentary rock-paper-scissors base. There are also many ways to trick your opponent or earn victory, some of which being hilarious and/or embarassing, which make for great storytelling even after the game has ended.

- "Mana Screwed". To play cards, you need to use mana, the resource of the game. You will inevitably play some games against people who could have little idea of the deeper gameplay going on, but if your hand is devoid of mana, you either risk playing that hand or you go one card down. The VS and WoW card systems have anti-mana screwed mechanics; you can play any card as a resource, though "plot twists" / "locations" (VS) and "quests" (WoW) were much preferred to be played in your resource row.

- Too much variety? The wide variety of cards leads to a select few cards being top dollar, and 80% of the cards players own stuffed in closets wasting space. Some cards have similar effects, but one is just "better" than the other for obvious reasons. 

Capcom vs. SNK 2 Pros and Cons

+ Options! An extremely wide cast of characters to select from for a fighter; many familiar faces across the board. You get to pick up to three of them for your team. You also select one of six different "grooves", which applies basic rules from six past fighters (3 Capcom, 3 SNK) that your team plays under. For example, some let you roll, air block, and so on. Finally, you have four points of 'ratio' to spend on your team of 1-3 characters, with ratio 1 characters being weakest and ratio 4 being a fucking house. (One ratio 4, however, means you only get one character.)

+ 1v1 "Teamwork". My A-Groove Iori might have a tough time against your C-Groove Blanka, but I have Cammy coming up next if Iori goes down, and she does fine against him. (That might be complete bullshit but you get the idea.)

+- - Tiers. The higher tiers in this game, while certainly nothing as excusive and godlike as in Marvel, are still very dominant. You'll never see a Kyosuke in an American tournament past round 1, and you'll see plenty of Sagats and Blankas. That being said, the mid tiers can still be relatively competitive, and it's always refreshing and exciting to watch skilled mid tier players like Combofiend (Rock/Rolento/Eagle) and Buktooth (Iori/Morrigan/Hibiki) run their game.

- No real team synergy. There's no tagging, no combined attacks, nothing outside of some special win quotes. From a gameplay standpoint this is more of a preference thing, but it's worth noting for the purposes of my game.

- Custom combos. The dreaded A-Groove. Its main draw is getting a full super bar, and then activating your Custom combo mode, where upon first activating you get some invincibility, and any hit landed while in the mode is turned into a fucking painful (and ridiculous looking) combo that ends in a super. It can be a very all or nothing mode (sometimes the worst thing that'll happen is you'll break their guard gauge and take off 15% anyway), and while it does get the crowd talking, I find it stretches the risk / reward balance too wide. To see some examples with Bison, check out the link below. The action begins at 1:03.

M. Bison makes babies cry

What have we learned? Card collecting and dispariging card rarities piques interest, finding the right variety amount is crucial, developing multiple decision options past rock paper scissors makes for more fun and interesting gameplay, keep the power of your cards and mechanics in check, and whatever do you, don't get mana screwed.